R

The 114 Factors of the MPR Algorithm

🔰 Category 1: Manpower and Force Size

Core Purpose: Measures the quantity, readiness, and scalability of a country’s human military assets, with relevance to both sustained offensive operations and territorial defense.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Active Military Personnel: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Defensive – Full-time troops under arms. Foundational to both defense and force projection. Weight: High
  • Reserve Personnel: ❌ Offensive / ✅ Defensive – Key to sustaining long-term defense. Especially relevant in countries expecting invasion or protracted war. Weight: Moderate to High
  • Paramilitary Forces: ❌ Offensive / ✅ Defensive / ✅ Hybrid – Border guards, internal troops, militias for civil conflict stabilization and rear-area defense. Weight: Moderate to High
  • Mobilization Capability: ✅ Defensive / ✅ Total War – National ability to scale up forces in wartime. Critical in attrition or homeland defense. Weight: High
  • Force Readiness: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Defensive – Combat availability and preparedness. Impacts deterrence and rapid response. Weight: High
  • Force Scalability & Retention: ✅ Defensive – Measures ability to sustain trained forces over long war. Relevant for conscript or aging populations. Weight: Medium

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Defensive-only militaries are not penalized for lack of expeditionary manpower if they demonstrate the ability to mobilize and hold territory under duress.
  • Offensively-oriented forces must maintain both readiness and sustainability across multiple theaters to justify higher ranking.
  • A small country with low active troops but deep reserves and mobilization infrastructure may outrank a larger expeditionary force in a homeland defense scenario.

🔰 Category 2: Weapons Systems & Destructive Power (Air and Land)

Core Purpose: Measures a country’s ability to inflict decisive damage across strategic, operational, and tactical domains, including both conventional and asymmetric systems.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Nuclear Warheads: ✅ Strategic Deterrence – Most decisive deterrent. Weight: Very High
  • Hypersonic Missiles: ✅ Offensive / ✅ A2/AD – Outpaces missile defense. Weight: Very High
  • Precision-Guided Munitions: ✅ Offensive – High lethality, low collateral. Weight: High
  • Air Superiority Fighters: ✅ All – Controls airspace. Weight: High
  • Main Battle Tanks: ✅ Offensive – Effective in open terrain. Weight: Medium
  • Self-Propelled Artillery: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Defensive – Firepower backbone. Weight: High
  • Combat Drones (UCAVs): ✅ Offensive / ✅ Hybrid – Expands reach. Weight: High
  • Strategic Bombers: ✅ Offensive – Long-range strike. Weight: Medium–High
  • Tactical Fighter Aircraft: ✅ All – Multi-role combat. Weight: High
  • Ballistic Missiles (Conventional): ✅ Offensive / ✅ A2/AD – Deep strike. Weight: High
  • Cruise Missiles: ✅ Offensive – Terrain-following precision. Weight: High
  • Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs): ✅ Defensive – Air denial. Weight: High
  • Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs): ✅ Defensive / ✅ Asymmetric – Armor killers. Weight: High
  • Rocket Artillery: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Area Defense – Saturation fires. Weight: Medium

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Quality > Quantity — relevant systems (e.g., drones, PGMs) matter more than raw numbers.
  • Offensive powers must show cross-domain capability. Defensive forces only need to deny conquest.

🔰 Category 3: Naval Power

Core Purpose: Assesses a country’s ability to project force, deny access, secure coastlines, and influence maritime domains. Especially critical for island nations, choke point controllers, and expeditionary navies.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Aircraft Carriers: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Strategic – Flagship of power projection. Weight: Very High
  • Submarines: ✅ All – Sea denial, intelligence, second-strike. Weight: High
  • Frigates: ✅ All – ASW, escort, patrol. Weight: High
  • Destroyers: ✅ Offensive – Long-range and air defense. Weight: Medium–High
  • Corvettes: ✅ Defensive – Coastal defense. Weight: Medium
  • Fast Attack Craft: ✅ Asymmetric – Missile ambush potential. Weight: Medium
  • Coastal Defense Systems: ✅ Defensive – Shore-based missiles. Weight: High
  • Mine Warfare Vessels: ✅ Defensive – Chokepoint disruption. Weight: Medium
  • Amphibious Assault Ships: ✅ Offensive – Island/expeditionary. Weight: Medium–High
  • Landing Ships (LSTs): ✅ Offensive – Tactical delivery. Weight: Medium
  • Patrol Vessels: ✅ Defensive – EEZ control. Weight: Low–Medium
  • Logistics Support Ships: ✅ Strategic – Enables sustained ops. Weight: Medium–High
  • Sea Denial Capabilities: ✅ Defensive – Anti-ship missiles. Weight: High
  • Naval Mine Capabilities: ✅ Defensive – Disruption multiplier. Weight: Medium

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Maritime denial powers score high even with small fleets if terrain and doctrine match (e.g., Iran, Vietnam).
  • Expeditionary navies (US, China, France) must justify reach via carriers, replenishment, and integration.
  • Naval power matters only when scenarios demand maritime dominance.

🔰 Category 4: Logistics and Supply Chain Resilience

Core Purpose: Assesses a country’s ability to sustain combat operations, mobilize resources, and outlast opponents in prolonged engagements.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Ammunition Stockpiles: ✅ All – Sustains long fighting. Weight: High
  • Fuel Reserves: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Defensive – Sustains operational tempo. Weight: High
  • Transport Aircraft (Strategic Lift): ✅ Offensive – Long-distance mobility. Weight: High
  • Tanker Aircraft: ✅ Offensive – Enables deep air ops. Weight: High
  • Transport Helicopters: ✅ All – Tactical mobility. Weight: Medium–High
  • Tactical Transport Aircraft: ✅ All – Internal movement. Weight: Medium–High
  • Wartime Production Capacity: ✅ All – Replaces losses. Weight: Very High
  • Industrial Base for Ammunition: ✅ Defensive – Domestic re-supply. Weight: High
  • National Infrastructure Resilience: ✅ Defensive – Survives disruption. Weight: High
  • Cyber Resilience for Logistics: ✅ Defensive – Defends supply chains. Weight: Medium–High
  • Repair and Maintenance Facilities: ✅ All – Rapid recovery. Weight: Medium–High
  • Merchant Marine Size: ✅ Offensive – Enables naval logistics. Weight: Medium–High
  • Rail/Road Networks: ✅ All – Strategic mobility. Weight: High
  • Surge Production Capability: ✅ Total War – Flexibility under pressure. Weight: Very High

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Defensive powers gain heavy scoring from resilience, ammo, and surge production.
  • Offensive militaries must show global lift, refueling, and sustained logistics.
  • Import-reliant nations are penalized under blockade or siege simulations.

🔰 Category 5: Command, Control, and Leadership

Core Purpose: Measures how effectively a military plans, executes, and adapts to battlefield events — including doctrine, morale, and decision-making.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Strategic Leadership: ✅ All – High command quality. Weight: Very High
  • C4ISR Systems: ✅ All – Awareness and control. Weight: Very High
  • Electronic Warfare: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Defensive – Disrupts enemy systems. Weight: High
  • Morale & Cohesion: ✅ All – Key in attritional wars. Weight: High
  • Military Education & Training: ✅ All – Determines professionalism. Weight: High
  • Warfighting Doctrine: ✅ All – Aligns force to threat. Weight: Very High
  • Special Forces: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Hybrid – Precision capability. Weight: Medium–High
  • Leadership Continuity: ✅ Defensive – Retains command under attack. Weight: Medium
  • Civil-Military Coordination: ✅ Defensive – Mobilization efficiency. Weight: High
  • Crisis Management Processes: ✅ All – Adaptability in war. Weight: Very High

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Offensive forces must have real-time targeting, doctrine, and flexible control.
  • Defensive nations are rewarded for cohesion, continuity, and resilience.
  • Leadership quality often flips war outcomes regardless of weapons.

🔰 Category 6: Psychological and Civilian Resilience

Core Purpose: Assesses national morale, unity, and ability to endure hardship during prolonged conflict. Crucial in defense and asymmetric wars.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Civilian Support for War: ✅ Defensive / ✅ Hybrid – Endurance capacity. Weight: High
  • Civilian Morale: ✅ Defensive – Avoids collapse. Weight: High
  • National Willpower: ✅ Defensive / ✅ Hybrid – Long war endurance. Weight: Very High
  • Destruction Tolerance: ✅ Defensive – Survives bombardment. Weight: High
  • Public Opinion on War: ✅ All – Political constraint. Weight: Medium–High
  • Civil Defense Programs: ✅ Defensive – Bunkers, prep. Weight: Medium
  • Media Control in War: ✅ Defensive / ✅ Authoritarian – Narrative shaping. Weight: Medium
  • National Unity: ✅ All – Prevents fragmentation. Weight: High
  • Psychological Warfare Capabilities: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Hybrid – Demoralization tools. Weight: Medium

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Defensive states are rewarded for national unity and resilience under fire.
  • Offensive powers gain minor value unless facing long asymmetric conflicts.
  • Morale often determines outcome more than firepower (Vietnam, Ukraine).

🔰 Category 7: Alliances and Strategic Partnerships

Core Purpose: Measures how effectively a nation leverages military alliances, basing rights, tech transfers, and shared deterrence to amplify combat power.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Formal Alliances (e.g., NATO): ✅ All – Collective defense. Weight: Very High
  • Defense Treaties: ✅ Defensive / ✅ Hybrid – Bilateral/multilateral. Weight: High
  • Strategic Partnerships: ✅ All – Deep cooperation. Weight: Medium–High
  • Foreign Tech Access: ✅ All – Enhances capability. Weight: High
  • Training Programs: ✅ All – Professionalization. Weight: Medium
  • Foreign Base Access: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Hybrid – Power projection. Weight: High
  • Policy Alignment: ✅ Defensive / ✅ Hybrid – Reliability under crisis. Weight: Medium–High
  • Intel Sharing: ✅ All – Improves awareness. Weight: Medium
  • Joint Military Exercises: ✅ All – Operational familiarity. Weight: Medium–High

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Smaller nations can rank high if protected by credible alliances.
  • Offensive powers benefit only if coalitions can sustain projection.
  • Unreliable or vague pacts (e.g., CSTO) are discounted unless proven effective.

🔰 Category 8: Terrain and Geography

Core Purpose: Assesses how a country’s physical geography enhances or constrains its military effectiveness, especially in defensive scenarios.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Homeland Terrain Defensibility: ✅ Defensive – Mountains, rivers, cities. Weight: Very High
  • Mountain Warfare Capability: ✅ Defensive – Asia, Caucasus, Andes. Weight: High
  • Coastal Defense Terrain: ✅ Defensive – Archipelagos, cliffs. Weight: High
  • Urban Warfare Preparedness: ✅ Defensive – Dense population slows invasions. Weight: Medium–High
  • Desert Warfare Capability: ✅ Hybrid – Maneuver advantage. Weight: Medium
  • Arctic Warfare Capability: ✅ Strategic – High-latitude defense. Weight: Medium
  • Jungle Warfare Capability: ✅ Defensive – Hinders mechanized forces. Weight: Medium–High
  • Border Length and Complexity: ✅ All – Influences defense planning. Weight: Medium–High
  • Strategic Chokepoint Defense: ✅ All – E.g., Taiwan Strait, Hormuz. Weight: Very High

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Defensive states with strong terrain (Iran, Vietnam) gain major bonuses.
  • Offensive forces are penalized for needing to fight across harsh geography.
  • Control of strategic terrain matters more than total land area.

🔰 Category 9: Advanced Warfare Capabilities

Core Purpose: Captures high-tech strategic disruption capacity — including cyber, space, AI, stealth, and electronic warfare — which can flip war outcomes before conventional combat begins.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Drone Swarms: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Hybrid – Saturation attacks. Weight: High
  • Cyber Warfare: ✅ All – Non-kinetic disruption. Weight: Very High
  • Anti-Satellite Weapons: ✅ Strategic – Target ISR and comms. Weight: High
  • Quantum Computing (Military): ✅ Strategic – Still emerging. Weight: Low–Medium
  • Artificial Intelligence: ✅ Offensive / ✅ Hybrid – Targeting, ISR. Weight: High
  • Space-Based Reconnaissance: ✅ All – Real-time awareness. Weight: Very High
  • UUVs: ✅ Defensive – Silent undersea assets. Weight: Medium–High
  • Directed Energy Weapons: ✅ Strategic – Missile/drone defense. Weight: Medium
  • Hypersonic Glide Vehicles: ✅ Offensive – Evade defenses. Weight: Very High
  • Space-Based Weaponry: ✅ Strategic – Rare, emerging. Weight: Low–Medium
  • BMD Systems: ✅ Defensive – ICBM interceptors. Weight: High
  • Electronic Countermeasures: ✅ All – GPS/radar jamming. Weight: High
  • ELINT/SIGINT: ✅ All – Real-time enemy tracking. Weight: High
  • Stealth Technology: ✅ Offensive – Survivability edge. Weight: High
  • Network-Centric Warfare: ✅ All – Integrated domains. Weight: Very High
  • Sensor Fusion Systems: ✅ All – Improves ISR clarity. Weight: High
  • AI Precision Strike: ✅ Offensive – Time-sensitive targeting. Weight: High
  • Military Comm Satellites: ✅ All – Secure global coordination. Weight: High
  • Undersea Communications: ✅ Strategic – Backup systems. Weight: Medium
  • Infrastructure Cyber Resilience: ✅ Defensive – Prevent collapse. Weight: Very High
  • Space Surveillance Systems: ✅ Strategic – Track satellites/debris. Weight: Medium–High
  • Hypersonic Defense: ✅ Defensive – Limited availability. Weight: Medium (High if confirmed)

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • Offensive powers need cyber, space, ISR, stealth for first-strike dominance.
  • Defensive states are judged by denial tech: BMD, EW, cyber shields.
  • These tools often define victory before a single tank rolls out.

🔰 Category 10: Strategic Doctrine and Force Orientation

Core Purpose: Assesses how a country actually intends to fight — not just what it has. Doctrine alignment governs every capability’s wartime application.

🔄 Factors and Doctrinal Relevance

  • Declared Force Orientation: ✅ All – Stated posture. Weight: Very High
  • Force Structure Alignment: ✅ All – Does capability match doctrine? Weight: Very High
  • Clarity of Strategic Objectives: ✅ All – Is the military built to achieve specific ends? Weight: High

🧠 Doctrinal Types in MPR

  • Pure Defensive – E.g., Switzerland, North Korea
  • Defensive/Offensive – E.g., China, Iran
  • Offensive/Defensive – E.g., France, Russia
  • Expeditionary – E.g., United States, UK
  • Asymmetric Deterrent – E.g., Vietnam, Israel

🧠 War-Type Alignment Logic

  • A country’s actual behavior and structure override political declarations.
  • Hybrid and adaptable doctrines gain scoring advantage in diverse scenarios.

🔰 Category 11: War-Type Alignment Effectiveness

Core Purpose: Final multiplier that adjusts all other categories based on how well a military is designed for the actual war it faces.

🧠 Core Principle

A military is not judged by abstract strength, but by scenario fitness. If a military is perfectly aligned to the war it fights (e.g., defensive doctrine in homeland defense), it receives a boost. If misaligned, it’s penalized.

🔄 Alignment Modifiers

  • ✅ Perfect Alignment: ×1.20–1.25
  • ⚠️ Partial Misalignment: ×0.85–0.90
  • ❌ Critical Misalignment: ×0.70 or lower
  • 🌀 Flexible Hybrid Doctrines: Scenario-dependent

🌍 Real-World Simulation Examples

  • Russia vs. NATO in Kaliningrad: Russia wins (home defense, layered denial)
  • India invades China in Tibet: China wins (terrain + doctrine)
  • U.S. vs. Iran in Strait of Hormuz: Iran wins (A2/AD advantage)
  • France vs. Mali insurgents: France wins (matched expeditionary doctrine)

✅ Conclusion

This category makes MPR predictive. It simulates *how* nations fight — not just what they have — and rewards the right doctrine for the right battlefield.