Sudan Military Power Ranking 2026
Sudan ranks 74th in the 2026 Military Power Rankings, with a fractured military environment shaped by civil war, competing armed factions, militia mobilization, and damaged national command structures.
Sudan retains large manpower pools, heavy equipment stockpiles, and deep combat experience, but its MPR score is weakened by the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces, degraded logistics, and the absence of a unified national defense strategy.
MPR Live: Sudan civil war live coverage →
MPR Overview
Sudan's military profile is defined by internal conflict. The Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces remain locked in a violent power struggle, leaving national defense authority divided across rival commands, militia networks, and contested regions.
In MPR scoring, Sudan gains credit for manpower, combat experience, armored and artillery stockpiles, strategic geography, and local firepower. It ranks lower because those assets are fragmented, poorly sustained, politically divided, and not organized under a functional national defense strategy.
Strategic Geography Schematic
- Khartoum contested command and logistics center
- Nile corridor, interior movement, and population axis
- Port Sudan, Red Sea access, and interim security hub
- Darfur and western militia-conflict zone
- Ethiopia, South Sudan, and border-security pressure
- Sahel depth, desert logistics, and contested supply routes
Analytical MPR visual: contested Khartoum core, Nile corridor, Red Sea access, Darfur conflict zone, border pressure, and desert logistics.
MPR strategic geography schematic. This is an analytical military-geography visual, not a survey-grade political map.
Core MPR Strengths
Combat Experience
Sudanese forces and militias have extensive experience in urban warfare, counterinsurgency, irregular operations, and territorial control from decades of internal conflict.
Heavy Equipment Stockpiles
Sudan retains large legacy inventories of tanks, armored vehicles, artillery, and aircraft, though many systems are old and unevenly maintained.
Militia Mobilization
SAF, RSF, tribal formations, and local militias can mobilize fighters through regional recruitment networks and informal security structures.
Strategic Geography
Sudan's position near the Red Sea, Horn of Africa, Sahel, and Nile corridor gives it major regional importance despite its internal instability.
MPR Doctrine and Strategy
Sudan currently lacks a unified national military doctrine. Its military activity is driven by civil war, factional control, survival campaigns, militia alliances, and short-term territorial objectives.
The country's strongest military attribute is combat familiarity in harsh internal environments. Its weakest areas are command unity, airpower readiness, naval function, strategic mobility, cyber capability, intelligence cohesion, and reliable sustainment.
Detailed MPR Assessment
Sudan ranks 74th in the 2026 Military Power Rankings (MPR). Following years of civil war, military coups, and the Sudanese civil war continuing since April 2023, Sudan’s military remains fractured, with control divided between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). An army-backed government and rival RSF authorities contest national control, while fighting continues in Darfur and other regions. Kamil Idris was appointed prime minister in May 2025; SAF had recaptured territory in Khartoum in March 2025. Sudan’s military strength lies in its battle-hardened forces, local firepower, and regional war experience, but its lack of unified command, modern equipment, and logistics significantly impairs its standing. The country’s security apparatus remains deeply unstable, undermined by external interference and internal factionalism.
Both SAF and RSF forces have developed extensive combat experience through engagements in urban warfare, guerrilla operations, and territorial control, particularly in Darfur, Blue Nile, and South Kordofan.
SAF and RSF forces possess armored vehicles and artillery, giving them significant localized firepower despite maintenance issues. The conventional combat-aircraft inventory belongs to SAF’s air force; both sides have used drones during the war.
Both factions utilize tribal affiliations, local militias, and cross-border recruitment, allowing them to quickly mobilize fighters and maintain control in rural areas.
Elements of both sides have received military supplies, training, and logistical support from foreign backers, including UAE, Egypt, and Libya, though this support remains fragmented and politically controversial.
Sudan lacks a unified military authority controlling both SAF and RSF
Rival forces (SAF and RSF) continue to fight for control
No joint operational doctrine or unified chain of command
Ongoing conflict in urban centers and rural regions weakens military cohesion
Many weapons and platforms are Soviet-era and poorly maintained
Air operations continue despite attrition and maintenance constraints, while naval capability remains limited
Logistics infrastructure, including depots and communications, is severely degraded
Dependence on black-market parts and foreign mercenary technicians
Independent strategic missile, cyber and integrated surveillance capabilities remain limited; both sides nevertheless employ drones
Cannot conduct sustained operations beyond national borders
Military actions are largely reactionary and based on short-term gains
No clear national defense strategy or deterrence framework
Sudan’s military environment is defined by chaotic dual-power structures, internal armed conflict, and a near-total breakdown of national military cohesion. While individual units are combat capable and armed with localized firepower, the country has no functional national defense strategy and no unified military authority. In the MPR system—which emphasizes force projection, modernization, and command structure—Sudan ranks 74th, reflecting its current state of disintegration and militarized instability.
Sudan does not possess advanced missile systems such as ballistic or hypersonic missiles. Its military focuses on conventional ground and air defense capabilities, with limited use of short-range surface-to-air and anti-tank missile systems.
Sudan has historically received military support and training from countries such as China and Russia, which have provided arms, equipment, and technical assistance. The country’s strategic location near the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa makes it an important player in regional security dynamics, although recent internal instability has complicated its external defense partnerships.
Force Profile
Wartime force definitions: SAF and RSF operate through rival command structures. The comparative personnel and aircraft-directory figures are dated reference estimates, not a sum of deployable forces under one national commander. Combat losses, recruitment and control of equipment continue to change.
Ground Forces
Sudan's ground forces are large on paper but split by factional command. SAF and RSF formations control different assets, regions, and supply networks, making national-level ground force capability far weaker than the raw inventory suggests.
Air Power
Sudan's air force has legacy combat aircraft and helicopters, but sustained operations are limited by maintenance problems, contested bases, degraded logistics, and fractured command authority.
Naval Forces
Sudan's naval power is very limited. Port Sudan gives the country Red Sea access, but its naval force lacks major surface combatants, submarines, meaningful blue-water reach, and robust logistics capacity.
Missile Systems
Sudan does not possess advanced ballistic or hypersonic missile systems. Its missile-related capability is limited to short-range air defense, anti-tank missiles, rockets, and artillery systems, with many assets affected by maintenance and supply problems.
Detailed Missile Inventory
| System Type | Known Role | MPR Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| MANPADS | Short-range air defense | Provides local defense against low-flying aircraft and helicopters, but availability is fragmented. |
| Iranian-Style Rockets | Battlefield fires and militia support | Useful in local fighting but not a strategic missile capability. |
| Chinese Artillery Systems | Ground fire support | Supports localized combat operations but is limited by logistics and maintenance constraints. |
| Anti-Tank Missiles | Armored threat defense | Limited tactical value in civil war conditions and urban combat. |
| Strategic Missiles | None | Sudan has no reliable ballistic missile, cruise missile, hypersonic, or nuclear delivery force. |
Nuclear and Strategic Deterrence
Sudan is a non-nuclear state and does not maintain nuclear weapons, strategic missiles, or long-range strike systems. Its deterrence profile is weak and fragmented, centered on local firepower, militia networks, and external support channels rather than national strategic capability.
Cyber, Space, ISR, and Electronic Warfare
Sudan's cyber, ISR, and electronic warfare capabilities are minimal. Intelligence structures exist, but civil war, competing command chains, and limited international cooperation undermine national-level situational awareness.
Partnerships and Alliances
Sudan has no stable formal defense alliance structure. Historically it received military support from China and Russia, while recent conflict dynamics have involved fragmented external support from regional actors.
Foreign interference, arms channels, mercenary activity, and proxy relationships complicate Sudan's security environment and reduce strategic autonomy.
Combat History
| Conflict / Period | Era | Military Significance |
|---|---|---|
| First Sudanese Civil War | 1955-1972 | Established the pattern of north-south conflict, militarization, and long-term internal instability. |
| Second Sudanese Civil War | 1983-2005 | One of Africa's longest wars, involving SAF operations against the SPLA and ending before South Sudan's independence. |
| Darfur Conflict | 2003-present | Government-backed militias and later RSF-linked formations became central to counterinsurgency and mass atrocity dynamics. |
| South Kordofan and Blue Nile Conflicts | 2011-present | SAF fought prolonged engagements against SPLM-N forces using airstrikes, artillery, and militia support. |
| War in Sudan | 2023-present | Open warfare between SAF and RSF shattered central authority and created severe urban and rural instability. |
| Border Clashes with Ethiopia | 2020s | Periodic fighting along the al-Fashaga border highlighted Sudan's fragile regional posture. |
Detailed Combat History
Sudan’s military history is dominated by internal conflict, civil war, and counterinsurgency campaigns. Its armed forces have rarely participated in conventional international warfare but have developed extensive combat experience in irregular and hybrid conflict environments.
First Sudanese Civil War (1955–1972): Conflict erupted between the central government and southern rebel forces demanding autonomy. The war lasted 17 years, ending with the Addis Ababa Agreement, but set the foundation for long-term mistrust and militarization.
Second Sudanese Civil War (1983–2005): One of Africa’s longest and bloodiest conflicts, this war pitted the Sudanese Armed Forces against the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). It involved scorched-earth tactics, mass displacement, and ethnic cleansing. It concluded with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and eventual independence of South Sudan.
Darfur Conflict (2003–Present): The government responded to rebel activity in Darfur by arming and deploying the Janjaweed militias, later reorganized as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The campaign included atrocities, drawing international condemnation and ICC indictments. Fighting continues intermittently.
South Kordofan and Blue Nile Conflicts (2011–Present): These areas remained contested after South Sudan’s independence. The SAF has fought prolonged engagements with the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement–North (SPLM–N), relying heavily on air strikes, artillery, and militia support.
War in Sudan (2023–Present): Open warfare erupted between the SAF and RSF in a power struggle over national control. Urban combat in Khartoum, airstrikes, and militia-driven campaigns across the country have destabilized the state and shattered central authority.
Border Clashes with Ethiopia (2020s): Tensions along the al-Fashaga border have led to periodic firefights and troop deployments, highlighting Sudan’s fragile regional posture amid internal breakdown.
Sudan’s military experience centers on domestic warfare, counterinsurgency, and militia-based operations. While highly experienced in internal repression and irregular fighting, its forces are not optimized for conventional external warfare or multinational operations.
2025–2026 developments: SAF retook territory in Khartoum in March 2025, while fighting continued elsewhere. UN reporting in May 2026 documented widening drone warfare by both SAF and RSF; in June it warned of further escalation around El Obeid. The conflict therefore continues beyond the archive’s 2023–2024 framing.
Geography, Economy, and Infrastructure
Sudan borders Central African Republic, Chad, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Libya, and South Sudan. Its geography spans desert, plains, Red Sea coastline, mountains, and river corridors, giving it strategic importance but also major internal-control challenges.
National Metrics
Geography and Sustainment Context
Climate: Arid desert in north, tropical in south
Terrain: Mostly flat plains; desert and mountains in the east and west
Natural Resources: Petroleum, gold, iron ore, copper, chrome, zinc, natural gas, hydropower
Major Military Districts / Commands: Regional sector commands under Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces (RSF)
Intelligence Infrastructure: General Intelligence Service (GIS), Military Intelligence
Intelligence Sharing Partnerships: Regional only; limited international cooperation
Major Ports: Port Sudan
Naval Replenishment Capability: Minimal
Energy Imports: Imports refined products; exports some crude
Strategic Petroleum Reserves: Limited emergency capacity
Domestic Defense Production: Light arms, ammunition, vehicles via MIC (Military Industry Corporation)
Military Installations (Domestic): Spread across major cities, many contested
Military Installations (Overseas): None
Foreign Military Support: The war has involved foreign military supplies and support networks; the archive’s Wagner and Iranian references describe earlier relationships, not a verified current personnel count.
Defense Alliances: None formal; fragmented affiliations with Gulf states and Egypt
Strategic Airlift Capability: Legacy An-12 and other small transport fleets; the November 2025 directory lists 13 transport aircraft, without establishing current wartime availability.
Wartime Industrial Surge Capacity: Low; dependent on militia networks
Defense R&D Investment: Minimal
Key Wartime Industries Beyond Defense: Sudan Gold Refinery, Gum Arabic Board, state agriculture
Founding Date: January 1, 1956 (independence from UK/Egypt)
System of Government: Transitional military regime with competing factions
Military Infrastructure and Readiness
Defense Industry
Sudan has state-owned defense factories for light weapons, small arms, munitions, and vehicle support through the Military Industry Corporation. However, production is constrained by conflict, sanctions, supply disruptions, and contested infrastructure.
Its wartime industrial surge capacity is low and dependent on militia logistics, black-market parts, foreign technical help, and fragmented supply networks. Key supporting industries include gold, agriculture, fuel logistics, and transport corridors.
Why Sudan Ranks 74th
Fragmented Command
Sudan lacks a unified military authority controlling both SAF and RSF, with SAF and RSF forces fighting for control and operating through rival command chains.
Obsolete Systems
Many tanks, aircraft, air defense assets, and artillery systems are Soviet-era or poorly maintained under wartime conditions.
Logistics Collapse
Depots, communications networks, roads, rail, airbases, and sustainment channels are degraded or contested.
Localized Firepower
Despite national breakdown, individual units and militias retain heavy weapons, combat experience, and regional mobilization capacity.
MPR Tools and Comparisons
Related Country Profiles
Ranking Navigation
War Simulations
Use the MPR War Simulator and War Portal to compare Sudan against regional and global military powers across manpower, civil war fragmentation, armor, airpower, missile systems, logistics, and strategic depth. These tools are designed for scenario analysis, not predictions.
Research Trail
Economic references use the displayed years and definitions. PPP international dollars are not nominal U.S. dollars. Military-expenditure shares use SIPRI’s GDP denominator; they are not calculated from the PPP figures. Nominal dollar trends are not measures of real purchasing-power growth. World Bank economic indicators; SIPRI military expenditure database.
Dated Force and Equipment Sources
- Military personnel comparison (dated IISS references) — Active, reserve and paramilitary categories are separate; Oman uses IISS 2024, Kuwait and Sudan IISS 2025. These estimates are not wartime effective strengths.
- Sudanese Armed Forces — Armed-forces article used as the initial force-structure reference; dated primary changes are distinguished below.
- FlightGlobal World Air Forces 2026, November 2025 directory — Pages 23, 25, 26 and 30: active, ordered, trainer, tanker and transport columns kept separate. Directory entries do not establish September 2026 operational availability.
- LSE IDEAS: FOCAC at 21, October 2021 — Space-cooperation research table records Sudan’s SRSS-1 Earth-observation satellite launched in 2019; current wartime serviceability is not established.
- UN: Sudan crisis, 19 September 2025 — SAF recaptured territory in Khartoum in late March 2025; does not imply countrywide control.
- UN Secretary-General: Sudan, 18 June 2026 — Ongoing SAF–RSF fighting and danger around El Obeid.
- UN/OHCHR: Sudan conflict and drones, 11 May 2026 — Both SAF and RSF drone operations; continued violence across multiple states, not a war ending in 2024.
This Sudan military power profile is part of the 2026 Military Power Rankings country series. MPR evaluates military power using force structure, readiness, modernization, geography, economy, industrial base, strategic weapons, alliances, infrastructure, and national resilience.
Country-Specific Sources